PHOTONIC VINE / PSIPP V13
Lighting comparison.
Explore two lighting architectures and their modeled electricity use.
Orbit the
scenes, inspect the visual model and follow the timeline.
LIVING CANOPY LAB
Rooted transplant · Day 0
Explore the visual comparisonDrag to orbit · Scroll to zoom · Space to pause
Horizontal LED boardReference: panel 30 cm above canopy, globally dimmed
30 cm vertical clearance target
Overhead · preparing
AC power · now—
Accumulated electricity bill—
Photonic Cascade49 flexible strands · 21 independently controlled segments
Adaptive segment activation & movable guides
Cascade · preparing
AC power · now—
Accumulated electricity bill—
Drag to orbit Shift + drag to pan · Scroll to zoomBotanical illustration · Heatmaps use the optical proxy
DAY 00 / 90Speed
What to expect: Day 0 starts with shared nursery lighting. The Cascade
is installed later and activates useful segments as the canopy fills the tent.
Energy overview
SCENARIO OUTPUT · DAY 00
—Cumulative AC kWh
—Cumulative AC kWh
—Spending difference, not verified yield savings
—Active / available / 21 total
—Unmet days determine interpretability
Electricity bill through growth
R$ 1.10 / kWh · 18h/6h → 12h/12h
Overhead boardPhotonic CascadeCost develops with the same timeline
Waiting for model output.
What changed in the canopy
Current day, model-dependent—
—
—
—
The same starting plant is allowed to develop different modeled architecture under the two photon fields. Parameters are hypothetical, not a cultivar-calibrated growth prediction.